In the 19th century, government officials came to understand that steel would be essential to both economic growth and national security. Thus, they devised policies that could sustain local production as well as prevent foreign producers from competing in domestic markets.
While steel and AI could not be more different, many economists view AI as a general-purpose technology that can stimulate both economic growth and innovation. Hence, policymakers must ensure domestic capacity.
However, many government officials also already see AI as a critical technology essential to both national security and economic progress.
Read More Publications
Trump 2.0: Clash of the tech bros
December 11, 2024 The tech giants courting Trump administration officials have conflicting interests. Getty Images In 2016, tariff man couldn’t care less about tech. Newly elected U.S. President Donald J. Trump knew that the people who created and ran America’s tech...
The Age of AI Nationalism and Its Effects
September 30, 2024 Policy makers in many countries are determined to develop artificial intelligence (AI) within their borders because they view AI as essential to both national security and economic growth. Some countries have proposed adopting AI sovereignty, where...
Data Disquiet: Concerns about the Governance of Data for Generative AI
The growing popularity of large language models (LLMs) has raised concerns about their accuracy. These chatbots can be used to provide information, but it may be tainted by errors or made-up or false information (hallucinations) caused by problematic data sets or...